Benchmarks reviewed 2026-07-07.
Face rent vs net effective rent
Face rent is the headline rate on a term sheet. Net effective rent (NER) is what you actually pay per square foot per year once free rent, TI, and other concessions are spread across the whole term. A “$30/SF with 3 months free and $30/SF TI” deal isn’t a $30 deal — it’s meaningfully less, and NER is the number that lets you compare offers apples-to-apples.
How free rent and TI change deal economics
Free months abate rent at the start of the term; TI and cash concessions are landlord contributions that offset what you pay. Both pull the effective rate below face:
scheduled(m) = face/12 × sf × (1 + esc/100)^floor((m−1)/12)
collected = Σ scheduled(m) − free-rent value
NER $/SF/yr = (collected − TI×sf − concessions) / (term in years) / sf
Straight-line vs NPV effective rent
The straight-line NER simply averages net rent over the term — the convention most brokers quote. The NPV mode discounts future rent to present value and solves the level rent with the same present value, which better reflects the time value of money on long or heavily front-loaded deals. Turn on NPV mode to see both.
Worked example
A 5,000 SF, 60-month lease at $30/SF face escalating 3%/yr, with 3 months free and $30/SF TI, collects $758,870 against $796,370 of scheduled rent. Net of the $150,000 TI, the NER is $24.35/SF/yr — about 18.8% below the face rate. To size the TI side of the deal, use the TI Allowance Calculator; to layer on pass-throughs, the NNN Lease Calculator.
How landlords use NER (and why face rates stay high)
Landlords prefer giving concessions over cutting face rent because face rates set building valuations and comps. A high face rate with free rent protects the headline number while still winning the deal — which is exactly why tenants should compare on NER. Investors capitalizing the income can carry the effective rent into the Cap Rate Calculator.